Fraud in the Public Sector: Analysis of Causes, Impacts, and Prevention Efforts in Government Financial Management

Authors

  • Khairunisa Khairunisa Department of Accounting, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Glen Hasian Marpaung Department of Accounting, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Galih Supraja Department of Accounting, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijerfa.v4i4.469

Abstract

This study analyzes the phenomenon of fraud in the public sector, focusing on government financial management. Fraud in this sector is often more prominent than in the private sector due to the characteristics of financial management systems that tend toward centralization and lack of transparency. The main causes of fraud include weaknesses in internal controls, lack of accountability, and the presence of pressure, opportunity, and rationalization as explained by the Fraud Triangle, Fraud Diamond, and Fraud Hexagon theories. Common types of fraud include bribery, abuse of authority, embezzlement of state assets, and extortion. The impact of fraud is very detrimental — not only causing significant financial losses to the state, estimated at hundreds of billions of dollars annually, but also damaging the government's image and eroding public trust. To prevent fraud, comprehensive efforts are required, including increased transparency, strengthened accountability, implementation of effective internal control systems, and the use of forensic accounting and investigative auditing. Additionally, the implementation of good governance and the use of fraud analytics play an important role in detecting and preventing unusual financial movements. This study concludes that fraud prevention in the public sector requires a sustainable multi-dimensional approach to maintain the integrity and efficiency of state financial management.

References

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people's money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press.

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.

Crowe, H. (2011). Why the fraud triangle is no longer enough. Crowe Horwath LLP.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2022). Report to the nations: Global study on occupational fraud and abuse. ACFE. https://www.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2022/

Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2012). Fraud examination (4th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.

Tuanakotta, T. M. (2010). Akuntansi forensik dan audit investigatif. Salemba Empat.

Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2018). Accounting information systems (14th ed.). Pearson Education.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2023). Laporan tahunan KPK 2023. KPK RI. https://www.kpk.go.id

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan RI. (2023). Ikhtisar hasil pemeriksaan semester (IHPS). BPK RI. https://www.bpk.go.id

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2009). ISA 240: The auditor's responsibilities relating to fraud in an audit of financial statements. IAASB.

Transparency International. (2023). Corruption perceptions index 2023. https://www.transparency.org

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo. Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 60 Tahun 2008 tentang Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban.

Mardiasmo. (2018). Akuntansi sektor publik. Andi Offset.

Singleton, T. W., & Singleton, A. J. (2010). Fraud auditing and forensic accounting (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-02

How to Cite

Khairunisa Khairunisa, Glen Hasian Marpaung, & Galih Supraja. (2026). Fraud in the Public Sector: Analysis of Causes, Impacts, and Prevention Efforts in Government Financial Management. International Journal of Economic Research and Financial Accounting (IJERFA), 4(4). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijerfa.v4i4.469

Issue

Section

Economics and Accounting