Optimizing Government Goods and Services Procurement Performance Through Digital Procurement Transformation: A Conceptual Framework for Public Organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijerfa.v4i4.463Keywords:
Digital Procurement Transformation, Procurement, Dynamic Capability Theory, New Public Management, Public OrganizationsAbstract
This conceptualization paper proposes an integrated framework for optimizing government procurement performance through digital procurement transformation. Drawing on Dynamic Capability Theory and New Public Management (NPM), this framework addresses a gap in the literature, which has largely discussed digital transformation, procurement governance, and organizational performance separately without demonstrating the synergistic relationships between them. This framework positions digital procurement transformation as a key driver for increased transparency, accountability, process efficiency, and information integration within public organizations. Through these mechanisms, organizations are expected to improve the quality of decision-making, the effectiveness of resource use, and overall procurement performance. Expected outcomes include increased procurement efficiency, the quality of public services, value for money, and increased public trust in government resource management. This framework provides conceptualization and practical insights for procurement managers and policymakers, and serves as a foundation for future empirical research.
References
Criado, J. I., Guevara-Gómez, A., & Villodre, J. (2021). Digital government, digital public services, and public value creation: Trends and challenges in public sector transformation. Sustainability, 13(10), 5614. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105614
Dobrolyubova, E. (2021). Measuring outcomes of digital transformation in public administration: Literature review and possible steps forward. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14(1), 61–86. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2021-0003
Klijn, E. H. (2012). New public management and governance: A comparison. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 201–214). Oxford University Press.
Mavidis, A., & Folinas, D. (2022). From public e-procurement 3.0 to e-procurement 4.0: A critical literature review. Sustainability, 14(16), 10158. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610158
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Public procurement and infrastructure governance: Initial policy framework. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Public integrity handbook. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Yusuf, M., Kurniawan, T., Nuraini, N., & Widodo, A. (2023). Exploring the role of digital leadership and digital transformation on the performance of public sector organizations. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(2), 799–808. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.12.012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Diva Maulidia, Sofa Aulia Rizka, Galih Supraja

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.















