Mitigating Procurement Fraud through Strengthening Internal Control Systems and Risk-Based Audits
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijerfa.v4i4.462Abstract
This conceptualization paper proposes an integrated framework to mitigate fraud in government procurement by strengthening the Internal Control System and Risk-Based Audit. This framework is built on the Fraud Triangle Theory, which emphasizes that fraud can occur due to pressure, opportunity, and rationalization, with a primary focus on reducing the opportunity factor through effective control and oversight mechanisms. This contextual framework was developed to address gaps in the literature that generally discuss Fraud, Internal Control Systems, and Risk-Based Audits separately without explaining the synergistic relationship between the three in the context of government procurement. In the proposed framework, the Internal Control System is positioned as a preventive control mechanism aimed at reducing the opportunity for Fraud to occur, while Risk-Based Audit functions as a detection and corrective control mechanism that ensures the effectiveness of controls and the organization's ability to respond to emerging risks. The synergy between these two mechanisms is expected to strengthen procurement fraud mitigation, increase transparency, accountability, integrity, effectiveness, and efficiency in public resource management. This conceptual framework provides a theoretical contribution by integrating the Fraud Triangle Theory with public sector control and oversight practices, while offering practical insights for Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP), internal auditors, procurement managers, and policymakers in designing more proactive and sustainable fraud prevention strategies. Furthermore, the proposed framework can serve as a basis for future empirical research.
References
Arena, M., & Azzone, G. (2009). Identifying organizational drivers of internal audit effectiveness. International Journal of Auditing, 13(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00392.x
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2013). Internal control—Integrated framework. COSO.
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2017). Enterprise risk management: Integrating with strategy and performance. COSO.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people's money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press.
Dorminey, J., Fleming, A. S., Kranacher, M. J., & Riley, R. A. (2012). The evolution of fraud theory. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(2), 555–579. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50131
Drogalas, G., Pazarskis, M., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Papachristou, A. (2017). The effect of internal audit effectiveness, auditor responsibility and training in fraud detection. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 16(4), 434–454.
Eulerich, M., Wagener, M., & Wood, D. A. (2022). Evidence on internal audit effectiveness from transitioning to remote audits because of COVID-19. Managerial Auditing Journal, 37(1), 140–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-09-2020-2830
Fazekas, M., & Sánchez, A. (2021). Government transparency and public procurement corruption. OECD Publishing.
Gaber, J. (2020). Qualitative analysis for planning and policy: Beyond the numbers. Routledge.
Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). (2020). International standards for the professional practice of internal auditing. The Institute of Internal Auditors.
Järvinen, M., & Mik-Meyer, N. (Eds.). (2020). Qualitative analysis: Eight approaches. SAGE Publications.
Maxwell, J. A., & Chmiel, M. (2014). Generalization in and from qualitative analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 540–553). SAGE Publications.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). Government at a glance 2023. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3d5c5d31-en
Rae, K., Sands, J., & Subramaniam, N. (2017). Associations among the five components within COSO internal control-integrated framework as the underpinning of quality corporate governance. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v11i1.4
Tsvetkov, V. Y. (2014). Conceptual models and conceptual modeling. Life Science Journal, 11(6s), 468–472.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurhidayah Dalimunthe, Reva Putri Arihan, Galih Supraja

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.















